Programming: Validate All Parenthesis in an Expression

Today, I am going to share one article about parenthesis validation in an expression. This can also be applied to a string containing parenthesis. So here we go.

Given an expression string exp, write a program to examine whether the pairs and the orders of “{“,”}”,”(“,”)”,”[","]” are correct in exp. For example, the program should print true for exp = “[()]{}{[()()]()}” and false for exp = “[(])”

Algorithm:
1) Declare a character stack S.
2) Now traverse the expression string exp.
    a) If the current character is a starting bracket (‘(‘ or ‘{‘ or ‘[') then push it to stack.
    b) If the current character is a closing bracket (')' or '}' or ']‘) then pop from stack and if the popped character is the matching starting bracket then fine else parenthesis are not balanced.
3) After complete traversal, if there is some starting bracket left in stack then “not balanced”

Implementation:

#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#define bool int

/* structure of a stack node */
struct sNode
{
   char data;
   struct sNode *next;
};

/* Function to push an item to stack*/
void push(struct sNode** top_ref, int new_data);

/* Function to pop an item from stack*/
int pop(struct sNode** top_ref);

/* Returns 1 if character1 and character2 are matching left
   and right Parenthesis */
bool isMatchingPair(char character1, char character2)
{
   if(character1 == '(' && character2 == ')')
     return 1;
   else if(character1 == '{' && character2 == '}')
     return 1;
   else if(character1 == '[' && character2 == ']')
     return 1;
   else
     return 0;
}

/*Return 1 if expression has balanced Parenthesis */
bool areParenthesisBalanced(char exp[])
{
   int i = 0;
   /* Declare an empty character stack */
   struct sNode *stack = NULL;
   /* Traverse the given expression to check matching parenthesis */
   while(exp[i])
   {
      /*If the exp[i] is a starting parenthesis then push it*/
      if(exp[i] == '{' || exp[i] == '(' || exp[i] == '[')
        push(&stack, exp[i]);

      /* If exp[i] is a ending parenthesis then pop from stack and
          check if the popped parenthesis is a matching pair*/
      if(exp[i] == '}' || exp[i] == ')' || exp[i] == ']')
      {
          /*If we see an ending parenthesis 
   without a pair then return false*/
         if(stack == NULL)
           return 0;

         /* Pop the top element from stack, if it is not a pair
            parenthesis of character then there is a mismatch.
            This happens for expressions like {(}) */

         else if ( !isMatchingPair(pop(&stack), exp[i]) )
           return 0;
      }
      i++;
   }
    
   /* If there is something left in 
   expression then there is a starting
      parenthesis without a closing parenthesis */
   if(stack == NULL)
     return 1; /*balanced*/
   else
     return 0;  /*not balanced*/
}
/* UTILITY FUNCTIONS */
/*driver program to test above functions*/

int main()
{
  char exp[100] = "{()}[]";
  if(areParenthesisBalanced(exp))
    printf("\n Balanced ");
  else
    printf("\n Not Balanced ");  \
  getchar();
}   


/* Function to push an item to stack*/
void push(struct sNode** top_ref, int new_data)
{
  /* allocate node */
  struct sNode* new_node =
            (struct sNode*) malloc(sizeof(struct sNode));
  if(new_node == NULL)
  {
     printf("Stack overflow \n");
     getchar();
     exit(0);
  }          

  /* put in the data  */
  new_node->data  = new_data;

  /* link the old list off the new node */
  new_node->next = (*top_ref); 

  /* move the head to point to the new node */
  (*top_ref)    = new_node;
}

/* Function to pop an item from stack*/
int pop(struct sNode** top_ref)
{
  char res;
  struct sNode *top;

  /*If stack is empty then error */
  if(*top_ref == NULL)
  {
     printf("Stack overflow \n");
     getchar();
     exit(0);
  }
  else
  {
     top = *top_ref;
     res = top->data;
     *top_ref = top->next;
     free(top);
     return res;
  }
}

Time Complexity: O(n)
Auxiliary Space: O(n) for stack.

Hope it helps. This article has been shared from Geeks for Geeks.
..... Next Time :)

0 comments:

Post a Comment

+